<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Making nodal panoramas that don&#8217;t suck</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jaysenmarais.com/blog/20080402/making-linear-panoramas-that-dont-suck/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jaysenmarais.com/blog/20080402/making-linear-panoramas-that-dont-suck</link>
	<description>Making it happen, bit by bit</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2011 08:12:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Everett</title>
		<link>http://www.jaysenmarais.com/blog/20080402/making-linear-panoramas-that-dont-suck/comment-page-1#comment-803</link>
		<dc:creator>Everett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 15:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaysenmarais.com/blog/20080402/making-linear-panoramas-that-dont-suck/#comment-803</guid>
		<description>@Douglas - Give Autopano Pro a try. I have had great success with this program. I would recommend using 25-50 control points per photo as well as smart blending. Save it directly to a JPEG because it will be too large to edit in Photoshop unless you have a monstrous computer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Douglas &#8211; Give Autopano Pro a try. I have had great success with this program. I would recommend using 25-50 control points per photo as well as smart blending. Save it directly to a JPEG because it will be too large to edit in Photoshop unless you have a monstrous computer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglas Nicolaisen</title>
		<link>http://www.jaysenmarais.com/blog/20080402/making-linear-panoramas-that-dont-suck/comment-page-1#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Nicolaisen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 01:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaysenmarais.com/blog/20080402/making-linear-panoramas-that-dont-suck/#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Hi,
Wondering if you know the software that would stitch a 70 picture Translating Focal Point Panorama. I have spent a number of years working on an image that I took in 1989 when the bErloin Wall came down. I took 70 contiguous 35mm film frames of some grafftti on the wall as I sidestepped along the wall. I have assembled the images into a 330,000 pixel by an average of 3500 pixel horizontal panorama.
Uncompressed tif the image is around 4.5 GB in size. I had some horizon creep up anb down but stayed a constant distance from the wall. The color balance trends a bit as I did it back in Photoshop 1 and worked from left to right andf matched as I went.   DO you know what softwatre could handle such a task as I would like to redo the image letting the computer handle the stitching and compare the results to see which is best.
Thanks,
Douglas Nicolaisen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
Wondering if you know the software that would stitch a 70 picture Translating Focal Point Panorama. I have spent a number of years working on an image that I took in 1989 when the bErloin Wall came down. I took 70 contiguous 35mm film frames of some grafftti on the wall as I sidestepped along the wall. I have assembled the images into a 330,000 pixel by an average of 3500 pixel horizontal panorama.<br />
Uncompressed tif the image is around 4.5 GB in size. I had some horizon creep up anb down but stayed a constant distance from the wall. The color balance trends a bit as I did it back in Photoshop 1 and worked from left to right andf matched as I went.   DO you know what softwatre could handle such a task as I would like to redo the image letting the computer handle the stitching and compare the results to see which is best.<br />
Thanks,<br />
Douglas Nicolaisen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.jaysenmarais.com/blog/20080402/making-linear-panoramas-that-dont-suck/comment-page-1#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 18:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaysenmarais.com/blog/20080402/making-linear-panoramas-that-dont-suck/#comment-17</guid>
		<description>The title is incorrect.  This post has nothing to do with linear panoramas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The title is incorrect.  This post has nothing to do with linear panoramas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mads</title>
		<link>http://www.jaysenmarais.com/blog/20080402/making-linear-panoramas-that-dont-suck/comment-page-1#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Mads</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 17:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaysenmarais.com/blog/20080402/making-linear-panoramas-that-dont-suck/#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Hi Jaysen. I see you have the same camera as me (G7) and use Hugin. I cannot figure out what focal length and focal length multiplier to use. Which do you use when you have zoomed all the way out? I tried 7.4 mm and x4.7 but doesn&#039;t yield good panoramas at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jaysen. I see you have the same camera as me (G7) and use Hugin. I cannot figure out what focal length and focal length multiplier to use. Which do you use when you have zoomed all the way out? I tried 7.4 mm and x4.7 but doesn&#8217;t yield good panoramas at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.jaysenmarais.com/blog/20080402/making-linear-panoramas-that-dont-suck/comment-page-1#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 01:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaysenmarais.com/blog/20080402/making-linear-panoramas-that-dont-suck/#comment-15</guid>
		<description>This advice is really going to help, thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This advice is really going to help, thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maggy</title>
		<link>http://www.jaysenmarais.com/blog/20080402/making-linear-panoramas-that-dont-suck/comment-page-1#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Maggy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 10:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaysenmarais.com/blog/20080402/making-linear-panoramas-that-dont-suck/#comment-14</guid>
		<description>I fully agree with Chrlz. Those who do want to make nodal panorama&#039;s will skip this tutorial because of the title while those who want to make linear pano&#039;s waste their time visiting this good but irrelevant tutorial</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fully agree with Chrlz. Those who do want to make nodal panorama&#8217;s will skip this tutorial because of the title while those who want to make linear pano&#8217;s waste their time visiting this good but irrelevant tutorial</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chrlz</title>
		<link>http://www.jaysenmarais.com/blog/20080402/making-linear-panoramas-that-dont-suck/comment-page-1#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Chrlz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 21:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaysenmarais.com/blog/20080402/making-linear-panoramas-that-dont-suck/#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Came to this page looking for info on *linear* panoramas, ie ones where the camera is moved along a linear path between shots.  While the page is a good tutorial, it is about normal (nodal) panoramas, so you may wish to change your title..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Came to this page looking for info on *linear* panoramas, ie ones where the camera is moved along a linear path between shots.  While the page is a good tutorial, it is about normal (nodal) panoramas, so you may wish to change your title..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Immersive photographs on the iPhone with PangeaVR at Jaysen Marais</title>
		<link>http://www.jaysenmarais.com/blog/20080402/making-linear-panoramas-that-dont-suck/comment-page-1#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Immersive photographs on the iPhone with PangeaVR at Jaysen Marais</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 13:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaysenmarais.com/blog/20080402/making-linear-panoramas-that-dont-suck/#comment-12</guid>
		<description>[...] panoramic photography, so my praise isn&#8217;t just that of the VR ingénue. I&#8217;ve toiled to stitch my own panoramas in the past only to have users unable to load the Quicktime/flash/java plug-in necessary to view [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] panoramic photography, so my praise isn&#8217;t just that of the VR ingénue. I&#8217;ve toiled to stitch my own panoramas in the past only to have users unable to load the Quicktime/flash/java plug-in necessary to view [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

